Subject:
|
Targeted Budget
Management (TBM) 2020/21:
Month 7
|
Date of Meeting:
|
3 December 2020
|
Report of:
|
Acting Chief Finance
Officer
|
Contact Officer:
|
Name:
|
Jeff Coates
|
Tel:
|
29-2364
|
|
Email:
|
Jeff.Coates@brighton-hove.gov.uk
|
Ward(s)
affected:
|
All
|
FOR GENERAL RELEASE
1
PURPOSE OF REPORT AND POLICY CONTEXT:
1.1
The Targeted Budget Monitoring (TBM) report is a key component of
the council’s overall performance monitoring and control
framework. This report sets out the forecast risks as at Month 7
(October) on the council’s revenue and capital budgets for
the financial year 2020/21.
1.2
As set out in the General Fund Revenue Budget 2020/21 report to
Budget Council, £7.825m was provided for in the budget for
reinvestment in identified cost and demand pressures across social
care and £7.220m for reinvestment in other priority service
areas. These sums were expected to meet identified demand-led, cost
and income pressures in 2020/21. The council also set aside a risk
provision of £0.750m to mitigate potential demand risks
and/or any difficulties in delivering savings targets. However,
since setting the budget the Coronavirus outbreak has had a severe
financial impact on the city and the council. This has been
reported through financial update reports to Policy & Resources
Committee in March, April, May, July, September and October. This
report shows the latest forecast impact on budgets and includes
memorandum information to indicate the element of the forecast
attributable to the pandemic.
1.3
The forecast risk for 2020/21 as at Month 7 is a £0.030m
underspend on the General Fund revenue budget. This includes a
forecast overspend of £0.313m on the council’s share of
the NHS managed Section 75 services. This is a further substantial
improvement of £7.823m from Month 5 reflecting additional
government support including £4.782m for the fourth tranche
of Government Emergency Response funding. There are, however,
underlying improvements in income and expenditure as shown in
paragraph 4.4 below.
1.4
As noted above, the council set aside a £0.750m risk
provision to mitigate risks identified at the time of setting the
budget. However, £0.575m of this now needs to be held against
the additional costs of the pay award, now confirmed at 2.75%, and
the remaining £0.175m has already been released in the
forecast outturn position above. Therefore, there is currently no
further risk provision available to mitigate the financial position
this year or next, including any Collection Fund deficit. However,
Policy & Resources committee has approved the use of a
financial smoothing mechanism to manage COVID-19 related budget
deficits, including the Collection Fund, by internally borrowing
from earmarked reserves.
1.5
The report also indicates that £3.593m (35%) of the
substantial savings package in 2020/21 of £10.291m is at
risk. Most of this (£3.115m) is due to pressures arising from
COVID-19.
2
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That the Policy & Resources
Committee:
2.1
Notes the forecast risk position for the General Fund, which
indicates an overspend of £0.030m. This includes an overspend
of £0.313m on the council’s share of the NHS managed
Section 75 services.
2.2
Notes the forecast net Collection Fund deficit of
£11.818m.
2.3
Notes the forecast for the Housing Revenue Account (HRA), which is
currently an underspend of £0.860m.
2.4
Notes the forecast risk position for the Dedicated Schools Grant
which is an overspend of £0.348m.
2.6
Approves a transfer of £0.440m from the current HRA
underspend to create an earmarked reserve for the catch-up of
responsive repairs works in 2021/22 as set out in Appendix 4.
3
CONTEXT/ BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Targeted Budget
Management (TBM) Reporting Framework
3.1
The TBM framework focuses on identifying and managing financial
risks on a regular basis throughout the year. This is applied at
all levels of the organisation from Budget Managers through to
Policy & Resources Committee. Services monitor their TBM
position on a monthly or quarterly basis depending on the size,
complexity or risks apparent within a budget area. TBM therefore
operates on a risk-based approach, paying particular attention to
mitigation of growing cost pressures, demands or overspending
through effective financial recovery planning together with more
regular monitoring of high risk demand-led areas as detailed
below.
3.2
The TBM report is normally split into the following sections:
i)
General Fund Revenue Budget Performance
ii)
Housing Revenue Account (HRA) Performance
iii)
Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) Performance
iv) NHS
Controlled S75 Partnership Performance
v)
Capital Investment Programme Performance
vi)
Capital Programme Changes
vii)
Implications for the Medium-Term Financial Strategy (MTFS)
viii) Comments of the Chief
Finance Officer (statutory S151 officer)
4
General Fund Revenue Budget Performance (Appendix 4)
4.1
The General Fund includes general council services,
corporately-held budgets and central support services. Corporate
Budgets include centrally held provisions and budgets (e.g.
insurance). Note that General Fund services are accounted for
separately to the Housing Revenue Account (Council Housing). Note
also that although part of the General Fund, financial information
for the Dedicated Schools Grant is shown separately as this is
ring-fenced to education provision (i.e. Schools).
4.2
The table below shows the forecast outturn for council-controlled
revenue budgets within the General Fund. These are budgets under
the direct control and management of the Executive Leadership Team.
More detailed explanation of the variances can be found in Appendix
4. Please note that the ‘COVID Variance’ column is a
memorandum-only column identifying the extent of the
‘Forecast Variance’ attributable to the pandemic.
Forecast
|
|
2020/21
|
Forecast
|
Forecast
|
COVID
|
Forecast
|
Variance
|
|
Budget
|
Outturn
|
Variance
|
Variance
|
Variance
|
Month 5
|
|
Month 7
|
Month 7
|
Month 7
|
Month 7
|
Month 7
|
£'000
|
Directorate
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
%
|
1,749
|
Families, Children & Learning
|
92,773
|
94,140
|
1,367
|
2,501
|
1.5%
|
10,760
|
Health & Adult Social Care
|
64,829
|
73,333
|
8,504
|
13,484
|
13.1%
|
9,274
|
Economy, Environment & Culture
|
39,361
|
47,606
|
8,245
|
11,496
|
20.9%
|
4,728
|
Housing, Neighbourhoods & Communities
|
16,599
|
21,750
|
5,151
|
5,352
|
31.0%
|
839
|
Finance & Resources
|
20,980
|
22,244
|
1,264
|
266
|
6.0%
|
174
|
Strategy, Governance & Law
|
5,450
|
5,615
|
165
|
353
|
3.0%
|
27,524
|
Sub Total
|
239,992
|
264,688
|
24,696
|
33,452
|
10.3%
|
(4,009)
|
Corporately-held Budgets
|
(8,204)
|
(12,426)
|
(4,222)
|
(3,110)
|
-51.5%
|
2,800
|
Corporate PPE Costs
|
0
|
2,800
|
2,800
|
2,800
|
0.0%
|
(18,462)
|
COVID-19 Grant
|
0
|
(23,244)
|
(23,244)
|
(23,244)
|
0.0%
|
7,853
|
Total General Fund
|
231,788
|
231,818
|
30
|
9,898
|
0.0%
|
11,818
|
Collection Fund Deficit
|
0
|
|
11,818
|
|
|
19,671
|
Total Forecast Deficit
|
|
|
11,848
|
|
|
4.3
The position above shows an overall improvement over TBM Month 5 of
£7.823m including the projected Collection Fund deficit. The
improvement arises from a mixture of improved income forecasts,
additional government Emergency Response grant funding received,
and improving expenditure forecasts. Shows a net reportable deficit
of £11.848m in 2020/21 indicating the level of internal
borrowing from reserves required to financially smooth the deficit
over a period of years.
4.4
The Budget Update report to the July committee meeting took the
TBM Month 2 forecast and looked at possible scenarios for the
remainder of the financial year. Officers’ best estimate of
the position was set out in the ‘Moderate View’
scenario which started with the TBM Month 2 forecast as the base
position. The table below compares the ‘Moderate View’
scenario reported to committee in July with an updated position as
at Month 7.
Updated Scenario (Moderate View)
|
Moderate View
Forecast
(July P&R) (£m)
|
TBM
Month 7
Forecast (£m)
|
Difference
Better (-)
Worse (+) (£m)
|
Base position: TBM
Forecast Month 2 (May)
|
36.003
|
36.003
|
0
|
Improvement due to
speed of recovery (Income)
|
-5.000
|
-8.986
|
-3.986
|
Further Mitigations
(i.e. cost improvements)
|
-3.000
|
-5.301
|
-2.301
|
Continued Capital
Programme pause
|
-0.500
|
-0.492
|
+0.008
|
Further government
COVID-19 funding
|
-10.000
|
-21.194
|
-11.194
|
Revised Outturn Overspend 2020/21
|
17.503
|
0.030
|
-17.473
|
Forecast Collection
Fund Deficit 2020/21
|
10.000
|
11.818
|
1.818
|
Total Projected Deficit 2020/21
|
27.503
|
11.848
|
-15.655
|
This table is provided to aid understanding of movements since
July. The final column shows that there have been improvements in
income, cost and grant forecasts largely due respectively to the
busier than expected summer, additional NHS income for care
placements, and substantial additional funding support from
government. The Collection Fund deficit remains higher but this
will be reviewed in detail during December to inform the January
Tax Base reports to Policy & Resources Committee.
4.5
The chart below shows the monthly forecast variances for 2020/21
and the previous three years for comparative purposes, however, the
impact of the pandemic clearly makes comparisons difficult at this
time.
Demand-led Budgets
4.6
There are a number of budgets that carry potentially higher
financial risks and therefore could have a material impact on the
council’s overall financial position. These are budgets of
corporate significance where demand or activity is difficult to
predict and where relatively small changes in demand can have
significant implications for the council’s budget strategy.
These can include income related budgets. These therefore undergo
more frequent and detailed analysis.
Forecast
|
|
2020/21
|
Forecast
|
Forecast
|
COVID
|
Forecast
|
Variance
|
|
Budget
|
Outturn
|
Variance
|
Variance
|
Variance
|
Month 5
|
|
Month 7
|
Month 7
|
Month 7
|
Month 7
|
Month 7
|
£'000
|
Demand-led
Budget
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
%
|
(42)
|
Child Agency & In House Placements
|
21,995
|
21,947
|
(48)
|
155
|
-0.2%
|
6,539
|
Community Care
|
70,774
|
74,468
|
3,694
|
6,570
|
5.2%
|
8,118
|
Temporary Accommodation
|
3,223
|
11,127
|
7,904
|
5,391
|
245.2%
|
14,615
|
Total Demand-led Budget
|
95,992
|
107,542
|
11,550
|
12,116
|
12.0%
|
The chart below
shows the monthly forecast variances on the demand-led budgets for
2020/21.
TBM Focus Areas
The main pressures
identified at Month 7 are across parts of Families, Children &
Learning, Health & Adult Social Care, Homelessness, Transport
and Culture, Tourism & Sport. Information about these pressures
and measures to mitigate them are summarised below:
4.7
Families, Children & Learning: The current projected
position identifies potentially significant cost pressures:
£1.046m on Services for Children with Disabilities;
£0.920m on Services for Adults with Learning Disabilities and
£1.020m on Home to School Transport. However, there is a
forecast underspend on Children in Care placements of
(£1.003m) together with other variances of (£0.616m);
this results in a forecast of £1.367m overspend as at Month
7. £2.501m of the forecast spend relates to COVID-19 being a
combination of loss of income, impact on savings targets and
additional expenditure due to the need to mitigate health risks
posed by COVID-19. Work will continue in implementing
financial recovery plans, but it is anticipated that demand for
statutory social care services will increase as families exit
lockdown. This could put additional demand on budgets.
The projected position for the
Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) is an overspend of £0.348m.
This is largely due to some significant emerging overspends in the
high needs block, most significantly mainstream school’s
top-up funding £0.235m and education agency placements
£0.292m. These pressures are offset by forecast underspends
elsewhere in the DSG. Overspend on DSG are carried forward within
the ring-fenced DSG budget.
4.8
Adults Services: The service is facing significant
challenges in 2020/21 in mitigating the risks arising from
increasing demands from client needs, supporting more people to be
discharged from hospital when they are ready and maintaining a
resilient local provider market. This is alongside supporting
vulnerable clients during the coronavirus pandemic, delivering a
significant financial recovery plan and developing integration
plans through the Better Care Fund.
·
Service pressure funding of £3.900m, including Better Care
and Winter Pressure funding, has been applied in 2020/21 and used
to fund budget pressures resulting from the increased demands and
complexity in the city. However, £1.550m was needed to
backfill the reduction in CCG funding contributions. Over the last
two years there has been an overall £3.750m reduction in CCG
funding due to pressures on local NHS budgets, however, this has
all been borne by the HASC budget although CCG funding also relates
to services in other directorates.
·
At this stage, £3.498m of the total financial recovery plan
measures of £4.387m are being forecast as unachievable in
this financial year. This is predominantly due to Covid-19.
·
Overall, HASC is forecasting to overspend by £8.504m in
2020/21 which clearly indicates the scale of the current
challenges. Actions are focused on attempting to manage demands on
and costs of community care placements across Assessment Services
and making the most efficient use of available funds. The majority
of the forecast overspend is a result of:
o
Covid-19 related
spend £13.484m;
o
Unfunded element
of cumulative CCG funding reductions of £0.361m;
o
£0.500m due
to System control issues following the implementation of new
software in April 2018, which have been identified and are being
addressed.
·
The
HASC directorate is planning a development programme called
‘Better Lives, Stronger Communities’ which aims to
implement a consistent strengths-based approach across key work
streams, ensuring robust pathways are in place, developing a
community reablement offer and re-designing the front door service.
This programme of work was temporarily paused due to Covid-19 but
is now moving ahead. This new way of working across the directorate
will be reliant on a corporate and city-wide approach. However, the
evidence at present indicates that the Health & Social Care
system is under considerable pressure and this is generating
additional costs for the council due to:
o
Pressures on NHS
budgets resulting in reduced funding contributions from the
CCG;
o
Significant
pressures on the acute hospital resulting in increased costs to
support timely discharge into residential and nursing home
care;
o
Ongoing
transformation of GP practices and enhancement of their clinical
screening and general medical services which contribute to
preventative support;
o
Pressures on NHS
outreach and other preventative services including community
nursing (known as Integrated Primary Care Teams);
o
There
is also focus nationally on improving rates of hospital discharge
in order to accommodate winter pressures.
The
funding of all care packages is scrutinised for Value for Money,
ensuring that eligible needs are met in the most cost-effective
manner which will not always meet people’s aspirations.
Established safeguards are in place to provide assurance within
this process
4.9
Housing Services and Temporary Accommodation: is now
forecast to overspend by £3.004m with a further overspend of
£4.900m for housing of rough sleepers to 31 March 2021,
totalling £7.904m. However, the report details
financial recovery measures of £2.950m using Flexible
Homelessness Support Grant and collecting HB from rough sleepers to
reduce this overspend to £4.954m compared to an estimated
£4.276m at Month 5. There are four main elements to this
overspend as follows:
·
a pressure of £1.513m arising from the continued higher
volumes of temporary accommodation being required for
‘business as usual’ (estimated 105 households) due to
the continuing local pressures and impact of the Homelessness
Reduction Act which introduced a relief duty of 56 days prior to
concluding statutory duties that might be owed. The service
has seen continued levels of overspending as in 2019/20 on other
areas of TA such as repairs and income collection which means that
£0.350m of savings are unlikely to be met. The numbers in
spot purchase accommodation at the end of 2019/20 were high at over
100 and so, due to the pandemic and the difficulties with moving
people on from temporary accommodation, it is assumed that numbers
will remain similarly high for the remainder of the year. The
budget is set at an average of 36 units of accommodation throughout
the year, hence the forecast overspend;
·
the number presenting as homeless has then risen sharply between
March and September as a result of the pandemic and housing those
at risk of rough sleeping as part of the response to the
‘everyone in’ initiative from the Government. This has
led to a further forecast overspend of £1.791m. As at the end
of October there were 149 units of spot purchase accommodation in
use due to the pandemic (so 254 in total in use across the
temporary accommodation service);
·
forecast underspend of £0.300m relating to the new investment
funding for an enhanced level of service for emergency short term
accommodation. This assumes the new contract is not in place during
2020/21;
·
A further pressure of £4.900m relating to the accommodation
costs of housing rough sleepers in university accommodation, hotels
and guest houses to March 2021. The Council has bid for resources
from the MHCLG under the Next Steps Accommodation Programme (NSAP)
and has been awarded £3.429m to the end of March 2021. This
grant will cover some of the costs of the ‘everyone in’
initiative for both HNC and HASC directorates but there remain very
significant cost pressures across both directorates. The council is
in the process of identifying which services will be funded by the
grant over the two Directorates and therefore, this grant is
currently not included in this forecast but instead is shown
corporately.
MHCLG have stipulated as a condition of
the grant funding that the council should move-on 40% of those
rough sleepers and people who were at risk of rough sleeping who
were accommodated as at 30th Sept, i.e. 148, by 31
December into more sustainable accommodation and restrict the
numbers housed going forward to those that are brought in from
rough sleeping. Therefore, current forecasts assume no further
growth in the numbers of households supported under the
‘everyone in’ initiative as budget resources have not
been identified. The service is planning to move all those housed
in hotels and guest houses into more sustainable accommodation by
31 March 2021. Further use of this accommodation after 31 March
will cause on-going service pressures in 2021/22 for the council. A
separate report ‘Next steps - Rough Sleeping and
Accommodation during COVID-19 Pandemic and Recovery’ was
considered by Housing Committee in November and includes the full
financial implications of the continuation of the ‘open
offer’ and recommends that Policy & Resources Committee
consider the financial impact.
Housing is undertaking an overarching
Temporary Accommodation ‘end to end’ Business Process
review with support resource from Performance and Improvement team.
This work will include considering how to reduce the use and length
of stay in Temporary Accommodation and be linked to improving
homeless prevention and enabling move on to more sustainable
accommodation. The review will also include an assessment of void
turnaround processes, income collection and repairs. Further
service transformation was due to be rolled out in March but has
been delayed due to COVID-19. The service is also having to adapt
to reflect the new approaches required under COVID-19 restrictions
and how it can engage differently with people at risk of
homelessness.
4.10
Environment, Economy & Culture: The Directorate
has substantial income budgets for parking, planning and venues and
for the council’s commercial property portfolio, all of which
are dependent on visitor numbers and commercial activity.
There is also a challenging additional income target for Parking
Services of £3.800m for 2020/21. These activities and
services have been heavily impacted by the COVID-19 lockdown and
the forecast is for significant income shortfalls compared to
budget for 2020/21 in all these areas.
Month 7 has seen a substantially
improved forecast of £0.811m for Culture, Tourism and Sport
including confirmed government furlough scheme income and increased
rental income with reduced casual staff costs and premises
costs.
The overall position (including the
latest forecasts for Sales, Fees and Charges grant income) has
improved the forecast overspend by £1.029m between Month 5
and Month 7 (£9.274m to £8.245m).
Monitoring Savings
4.11
The savings package approved by full Council to support the revenue
budget position in 2020/21 was £10.291m following directly on
from a £12.236m savings package in 2019/20. This is very
significant and follows eight years of substantial packages
totalling over £142m that have been necessary to enable cost
and demand increases to be funded alongside managing reductions in
central government grant funding.
4.12
Appendix 4 provides a summary of savings in each directorate and
indicates in total what is anticipated/achieved or is at risk.
Appendix 5 summarises the position across all directorates and
presents the entire savings programme. The graph below provides a
summary of the latest position and indicates that £3.593m
(35%) is currently at risk. Of this £3.115m is in respect of
pressures relating to COVID-19. Mitigation of these risks will be
included in the development of services’ financial recovery
actions as far as possible.
5
Housing Revenue Account Performance (Appendix 4)
5.1
The Housing Revenue Account is a separate ring-fenced account
within the General Fund that covers income and expenditure related
to the management and operation of the council’s housing
stock. Expenditure is generally funded by Council Tenants’
rents and housing benefits. The forecast outturn is currently an
underspend of £0.860m and more details are provided in
Appendix 4.
6
Dedicated Schools Grant Performance (Appendix 4)
6.1
The Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) is a ring-fenced grant within the
General Fund which can only be used to fund expenditure on the
schools budget. The schools budget includes elements for a range of
services provided on an authority-wide basis including Early Years
education provided by the Private, Voluntary and Independent (PVI)
sector, and the Individual Schools Budget (ISB) which is divided
into a budget share for each maintained school. The forecast
outturn is an overspend of £0.348m and more details are
provided in Appendix 4. Under the Schools Finance Regulations any
underspend or overspend must be carried forward within the schools
budget.
7
NHS Managed S75 Partnership Performance (Appendix 4)
7.1
The NHS Trust-managed Section 75 Services represent those services
for which local NHS Trusts act as the Host Provider under Section
75 Agreements. Services are managed by Sussex Partnership
Foundation Trust (SPFT) and include health and social care services
for Adult Mental Health and Memory and Cognitive Support
Services.
7.2
This partnership is subject to separate annual risk-sharing
arrangements and the monitoring of financial performance is the
responsibility of the respective host NHS Trust provider.
Risk-sharing arrangements result in financial implications for the
council where a partnership is underspent or overspent at year-end
and hence the performance of the partnership is included within the
forecast outturn for the Health & Adult Social Care
directorate. An overspend of £0.313m is currently forecast
and more details are provided in Appendix 4.
8
Capital Programme Performance and Changes
Forecast Variance Month 5
|
|
Reported Budget Month 7
|
Forecast Outturn Month 7
|
Forecast Variance Month 7
|
Forecast Variance Month 7
|
£'000
|
Directorate
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
£'000
|
%
|
0
|
Families, Children
& Learning
|
33,610
|
33,610
|
0
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Health & Adult
Social Care
|
693
|
693
|
0
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Economy, Environment
& Culture
|
75,693
|
75,693
|
0
|
0.0%
|
0
|
Housing,
Neighbourhoods & Communities
|
2,859
|
2,859
|
0
|
0.0%
|
(2,417)
|
Housing Revenue
Account
|
49,508
|
46,559
|
(2,949)
|
-6.0%
|
0
|
Finance &
Resources
|
3,395
|
3,173
|
(222)
|
-6.5%
|
0
|
Strategy, Governance
& Law
|
1,347
|
1,347
|
0
|
0.0%
|
(2,417)
|
Total
Capital
|
167,104
|
163,933
|
(3,171)
|
-1.9%
|
8.2
Appendix 6 shows the changes to the capital budget and Appendix 7
provides details of new schemes for 2020/21 to be added to the
capital programme which are included in the budget figures above.
Policy & Resources Committee’s approval for these changes
is required under the council’s Financial Regulations. The
following table shows the movement in the capital budget since
approval at Budget Council.
|
Reported Budget Month 7
|
Summary of Capital Budget Movement
|
£'000
|
Budget approved at
Month 5
|
155,380
|
Changes reported at
other committees and already approved
|
9,620
|
New schemes for
approval in this report (see Appendix 7)
|
8,122
|
Variations to budget
(for approval)
|
1,051
|
Reprofiling of
budget (for approval)
|
(7,069)
|
Slippage (for
noting)
|
0
|
Total
Capital
|
167,104
|
8.3
Appendix 6 also details any slippage into next year. However, due
to the impact of the pandemic most programme managers have made
early estimates of necessary reprofiling of schemes which it would
not be appropriate to describe as normal slippage. The level of
reprofile requests is likely to increase further due to the current
lockdown and other possible ongoing local ‘Tier’
measures. Policy & Resources Committee will also be
deliberating (separately) on currently ‘paused’ capital
schemes and, whether paused or un-paused, this is likely to further
impact capital scheme profiling.
9
Implications for the Medium-Term Financial Strategy (MTFS)
9.1
The council’s MTFS sets out resource assumptions and
projections over a longer term. It is periodically updated
including a major annual update which is included in the annual
revenue budget report to Policy & Resources Committee and Full
Council. This section highlights any potential implications for the
current MTFS arising from in-year TBM monitoring above and details
any changes to financial risks together with any impact on
associated risk provisions, reserves and contingencies. Details of
Capital Receipts and Collection Fund performance are also given
below because of their potential impact on one-off or future
resources.
Capital Receipts Performance
9.2
Capital receipts are used to support the capital programme. Any
changes to the level of receipts during the year will impact on
future years’ capital programmes and may impact on the level
of future investment for corporate funds and projects such as the
Strategic Investment Fund, Modernisation Fund, Asset Management
Fund and the Information, Technology and Digital Investment Fund.
The planned profile of capital receipts for 2020/21, as at Month 7,
is £10.962m which includes significant receipts expected from
the land transferring to the Housing Joint Venture, a number of
lease extensions and property sales identified to support Stanmer
redevelopment. To date there have been receipts of £1.888m in
relation to the disposal of Oxford Street Car Park, the overage
settlement for the Shoreham Airport, some small leases and some
minor loan repayments. The capital receipts performance will be
monitored over the coming months against capital commitments.
9.3
The forecast for the ‘right to buy sales’ in 2020/21
(after allowable costs, repayment of housing debt and forecast
receipt to central government) is that an estimated 30 to 40 homes
will be sold with a maximum useable receipt of £0.515m to
fund the corporate capital programme and net retained receipt of up
to £4.000m available to re-invest in replacement homes. To
date 16 homes have been sold in 2020/21.
Collection Fund Performance
9.4
The Collection Fund is a separate account for transactions in
relation to council tax and business rates. Any deficit or surplus
forecast on the collection fund relating to council tax is
distributed between the council, Sussex Police and Crime
Commissioner and East Sussex Fire Authority, whereas any forecast
deficit or surplus relating to business rates is shared between the
council, East Sussex Fire Authority and the government.
9.5
The council tax collection fund is forecast to be in deficit by
£9.775m of which £9.805m relates to the current year
equating to 5.2% of the budgeted income and £0.530m from the
deficit brought forward.
9.6
The main contributors to the deficit are forecast losses in
collection of £4.730m relating to both the current year and
the collection of arrears, increased CTR awards of £2.485m,
continuing increase in SMI exemptions (including backdated
elements) £0.495m and shortfalls in liability, in part due to
less properties being added to the valuation list at £0.495m.
In addition, there are higher than forecast awards of other
discounts totalling £0.500m (includes Single Person Discounts
and disregards for students and SMI claimants) and other exemptions
totalling £0.540m, including probate and patient exemptions.
The council's share of the overall forecast council tax deficit is
£8.298m.
9.7
The business rates collection fund is forecast to be in deficit by
£7.184m. This is based on the estimated impact of COVID-19 on
reduced collection of business rates income and potential business
failures equating to 5% of the original net rates payable and
increased empty property relief. The council’s 49% share of
the deficit is £3.520m.
9.8
The combined collection fund deficit of £11.818m would need
to be funded from one-off resources; normally this would be
considered as part of the 2021/22 budget setting process.
Reserves, Budget Transfers and
Commitments
9.9
The creation of reserves, the approval of budget transfers
(virements) of over £0.250m, and agreement to new financial
commitments of corporate financial significance that are not
provided for in the council’s approved Budget and Policy
Framework require Policy & Resources Committee approval in
accordance with the council’s Financial Regulations and
Standard Financial Procedures. There is one item requiring approval
at this time.
9.10
In Housing Management, a significant backlog of Council Housing
repairs and maintenance has built up mainly as a result of reduced
activity due to COVID-19. It is proposed to create an earmarked
reserve of £0.440m from the currently forecast underspend and
to top this up from further any further repairs and maintenance
underspends in order to fund the work carrying over into 2021/22.
This is contained wholly within the ring-fenced Housing Revenue
Account (HRA). Further details are provided in Appendix 4.
10
ANALYSIS & CONSIDERATION OF ANY ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS
10.1
The provisional outturn position on the General Fund is an
overspend of £0.030m. This includes a forecast overspend of
£0.313m on the council’s share of the NHS managed
Section 75 services. Together with a forecast deficit on the
Collection Fund of £11.818m, this indicates a current deficit
of £11.848m.
10.2
There are no further financial risk provisions available to
mitigate the forecast position. Any overspend at the year-end would
normally need to be funded from general reserves and balances which
would then need to be replenished to ensure that the working
balance did not remain below the recommended level of
£9.000m. The management of the forecast deficit will be
considered as part of the budget proposals for 2021/22 coming to
February Policy & Resources Committee and Budget Council. This
will include exemplification of the overall position on one-off
resources and consider options for internally borrowing from
reserves (financial smoothing) to manage any outstanding
deficit.
11
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT & CONSULTATION
11.1
No specific consultation has been undertaken in relation to this
report.
12.1
The forecast underspend at Month 7 shows a significant improvement
and is close to break-even, primarily due to substantial government
funding support for the various financial impacts of the pandemic
that have been previously reported. The forecast indicates a number
of underlying demand and cost pressures alongside income and
taxation losses which are now primarily a cause for concern in
managing finances in 2021/22 and beyond. Local Government will
therefore be looking closely at the Spending Review and hoping for
ongoing assistance, particularly in recognition of the higher
baseline of people now in social care placements and in Temporary
and Emergency Housing as well as support for ongoing impacts across
a range of services and income, including Council Tax and Business
Rates income, due to the potential economic impact.
Term Time
Only Back Pay
12.2
On another matter, at its meeting on 18 July 2020 the committee
considered the matter of defraying the projected £3.8m back
pay liability arising from a change to the calculation of holiday
pay for Term Time Only (TTO) staff, the significant majority of
whom are in schools. The proposal put to schools was that although
the liability is, legally, an eligible charge on schools’
budgets, the council recognised the financial pressure on schools
and offered to meet 50% of the liability and to borrow internally
from its reserves to allow both schools and the General Fund to
spread the cost over 10 years. At the meeting an amendment was
approved by the committee as follows: That the Committee agrees to
explore further options for the proposed funding of Schools Term
Time Only back pay and asks for it to be considered by the Schools
Forum.
12.3
This work was undertaken by officers who explored options for
allocation of the liability across schools and also gave further
consideration to the share of the liability. Allocation options
including a weighted model giving more support to small schools and
special schools, and a weighted model giving more support to
schools with higher numbers of disadvantaged pupils were explored
but discounted as they created gainers and losers that would not
only be potentially divisive but were inconsistent with the
principles of schools funding allocations. The share of funding was
reconsidered but during this period it emerged that the council was
projecting a very large budget gap of at least £17m for
2021/22 as well as significant funding uncertainty and ongoing risk
and therefore no budget flexibility was available to increase the
offer. During this period the substantial government funding
package for schools over the next 2 years was also confirmed.
However, in the event, the final back pay liability figure was
calculated at £3.3m rather than the projected £3.8m,
i.e. £0.5m lower, and therefore, by fixing the council
contribution this had the effect of improving the offer for schools
and changed the share of the liability with 57% being met by the
council and 43% to be met by schools.
12.4
The Schools Forum and Heads were informed of this approach in
mid-October, including the improved share of costs from their
perspective, and a letter was sent by the Executive Director of
Families, Children & Schools to all heads confirming the
position. The individual liabilities for each school have been
calculated and will be notified by Schools Finance as part of their
2021/22 budgets.
13
FINANCIAL AND OTHER IMPLICATIONS
Financial Implications:
13.1
The financial implications are covered in the main body of the
report. Financial performance is kept under review on a monthly
basis by the Executive Leadership Team and the management and
treatment of forecast risks is considered by the Audit &
Standards Committee as part of its review of strategic risks.
Finance Officer Consulted: Jeff
Coates
Date: 17th November 2020
Legal Implications:
13.2
Decisions taken in relation to the capital and revenue budget must
enable the council to observe its legal duty to achieve best value
by securing continuous improvement in the way in which its
functions are exercised, having regard to a combination of economy,
efficiency and effectiveness. The council must also comply with its
general fiduciary duties to its Council Taxpayers by acting with
financial prudence, and bear in mind the reserve powers of the
Secretary of State under the Local Government Act 1999 to limit
Council Tax & precepts.
Lawyer Consulted: Elizabeth
Culbert
Date: 17th November 2020
Equalities Implications:
13.3
There are no direct equalities implications arising from this
report.
Sustainability Implications:
13.4
Although there are no direct sustainability implications arising
from this report, the council’s financial position is an
important aspect of its ability to meet council priorities. In
addition, the council’s response to managing the impact of
the pandemic will be important to demonstrate that in a worst case
scenario, it has plans to manage the financial impact and maintain
its longer term financial resilience and sustainability.
Risk and Opportunity Management Implications:
13.5
The council’s revenue budget and Medium Term Financial
Strategy contain risk provisions to accommodate emergency spending,
even out cash flow movements and/or meet exceptional items. The
council maintains a recommended minimum working balance of
£9.000m to mitigate these risks. The council also maintains
other general and earmarked reserves and contingencies to cover
specific project or contractual risks and commitments. However,
current reserves and balances were not set at a level to manage
financial shocks of the scale of the pandemic and any depletion of
reserves and balances to manage this position will normally require
a plan for replenishment in future years.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Appendices:
1.
Financial Dashboard Summary
2.
Revenue Budget Movement Since Month 2
3.
Revenue Budget RAG Ratings
4.
Revenue Budget Performance
5.
Summary of 2020/21 Savings Progress
6.
Capital Programme Performance
7.
New Capital Schemes
Documents in
Members’ Rooms: None.
Background
Documents: None.